Mental Health and Insanity Defenses

Insanity defenses in Georgia are hyper-specific and succeed only within a very narrow legal window. They require clear evidence that, at the time of the alleged offense, the defendant met a strict statutory standard. These cases are complex, fact-sensitive, and heavily scrutinized. Before pursuing this path, clients and their support systems should consult closely with defense counsel to determine whether an insanity plea is strategically appropriate.

It is also important to understand that most mitigation work does not involve insanity pleas. In the majority of criminal cases, mitigation focuses on plea consultation, contextualizing behavior, demonstrating genuine remorse, outlining treatment engagement, and presenting credible rehabilitation potential. Insanity is rare. Mitigation is common. Each requires a different forensic lens.

Georgia Forensic Consulting provides objective, trauma-informed forensic evaluations aligned with Georgia law and current standards of practice. We work collaboratively with attorneys to clarify whether an insanity defense is viable, or whether the case is better served through structured mitigation strategy.

Georgia Forensic Consulting provides comprehensive, trauma-informed forensic mental health evaluations in cases involving insanity pleas and criminal responsibility. We work with defense attorneys across Georgia to assess whether a defendant meets the legal standard for insanity at the time of the alleged offense, and we provide clear, court-ready reports and expert testimony when needed.

Our evaluations are grounded in Georgia law, current forensic research, and careful clinical assessment. We are particularly experienced in cases involving PTSD, psychosis, bipolar disorder with mania, intellectual disabilities, and trauma-related dissociation.

Understanding Insanity Pleas in Georgia

Georgia follows a modified M’Naghten standard for insanity. The law focuses on whether, at the time of the alleged act, the defendant lacked the mental capacity to understand the nature of the act or that it was wrong.

1. Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI)

Under Georgia law, a defendant may be found Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity if, at the time of the offense, due to mental disease or defect, the person:

  • Did not have the mental capacity to distinguish between right and wrong in relation to the act, or

  • Acted under a delusional compulsion that overmastered the will, and which, if true, would have justified the act.

A successful NGRI verdict results in commitment to a state forensic hospital rather than prison. The defendant remains under court supervision and is typically committed until no longer meeting criteria for involuntary hospitalization.

Our role:

  • Conduct a detailed retrospective evaluation of mental state at the time of the offense

  • Analyze police reports, discovery, body-cam footage, medical records, and witness statements

  • Assess for psychosis, mania, trauma-related disorders, cognitive impairment, and malingering

  • Provide a legally relevant opinion with statutory analysis

  • Offer testimony when required

2. Guilty But Mentally Ill (GBMI)

Georgia also allows a verdict of Guilty But Mentally Ill. This applies when:

  • The defendant was mentally ill at the time of the offense, but

  • The illness did not meet the legal threshold for insanity.

In GBMI cases, the defendant is convicted and sentenced but may receive mental health treatment while incarcerated.

Our role:

  • Clarify whether the clinical presentation meets criteria for mental illness

  • Distinguish between severe mental illness and legal insanity

  • Address aggravating and mitigating psychiatric factors

  • Evaluate treatment needs and risk factors

3. Delusional Compulsion

Georgia uniquely recognizes delusional compulsion as a distinct basis for insanity. This applies when:

  • The defendant acted under a fixed, false belief (a delusion), and

  • If that belief had been true, the act would have been justified.

This is most commonly seen in severe psychotic disorders but may also arise in trauma-related or mood-related psychosis.

Our evaluations carefully assess:

  • The presence of fixed delusions

  • Whether the delusion directly caused the alleged act

  • Whether the belief system was internally consistent and longstanding

  • Whether malingering or exaggeration is present

4. Competency to Stand Trial vs. Insanity

Insanity addresses mental state at the time of the offense. Competency addresses current functioning.

Competency to stand trial requires that the defendant:

  • Understand the charges and courtroom roles

  • Assist counsel in a rational manner

Georgia Forensic Consulting provides both competency and insanity evaluations when requested, with clear differentiation between past mental state and current functioning.

Our Evaluation Process

Our forensic evaluations are structured, thorough, and designed for courtroom scrutiny.

  1. Multi-session clinical interview

  2. Collateral interviews when appropriate

  3. Comprehensive record review

  4. Psychological screening tools when indicated

  5. Structured malingering assessment

  6. Psychological and/or psychiatric referrals when necessary (we coordinate this)

  7. Diagnostic formulation using DSM-5-TR criteria

  8. Legal analysis tied directly to Georgia statutes

  9. Clear, well-organized forensic report

Each report includes:

  • Referral question

  • Sources of information

  • Mental status findings

  • Diagnostic impressions

  • Analysis of criminal responsibility

  • Opinion stated within a reasonable degree of professional certainty

Conditions Commonly Relevant to Insanity Evaluations

We frequently evaluate cases involving:

  • Schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders

  • Bipolar disorder with psychotic features

  • Severe PTSD with dissociation

  • Substance-induced psychosis

  • Intellectual disabilities

  • Neurocognitive disorders

  • Complex trauma presentations

Special attention is given to differentiating true psychosis from personality pathology, substance intoxication, anger reactions, or situational distress.

Trauma-Informed Forensic Analysis

Many defendants presenting for insanity evaluations have histories of severe trauma. While trauma alone does not establish insanity, it may:

  • Contribute to dissociation

  • Intensify psychotic decompensation

  • Interact with substance use

  • Impair judgment under extreme stress

Our evaluations integrate neurobiological and trauma-informed frameworks while remaining strictly aligned with statutory standards.

For Attorneys

We understand the strategic realities of criminal defense. Our role is not advocacy disguised as science. Our role is objective forensic analysis that strengthens credibility.

We provide:

  • Pre-plea consultation

  • Record review for case viability

  • Second-opinion evaluations

  • Mitigation integration when insanity is not met

  • Clear explanation of complex psychiatric concepts for juries

If the legal standard is not met, we will say so. If it is met, we provide a defensible, well-documented basis for that opinion.

Statewide Georgia Service

Georgia Forensic Consulting serves attorneys in:

  • Fulton County

  • Cobb County

  • Gwinnett County

  • DeKalb County

  • Clayton County

  • Cherokee County

  • Pickens County

  • Surrounding jurisdictions throughout Georgia

In-person and secure telehealth forensic interviews available when appropriate.

Consultation

If you are considering an insanity plea, early consultation is critical. Preservation of mental health records, jail observations, and timely evaluation can significantly affect the outcome.

To discuss a case or schedule an evaluation, contact Georgia Forensic Consulting directly.

Clear analysis. Court-ready reporting. Trauma-informed forensic expertise.

Contact Us